Research for Street Furniture
Client:
Newcastle City Center
Brief:
"We want Newcastle city centre to appear innovative, exciting, and digitally advanced as part of our smart city agenda. We would like you to design and propose some Interactive Street Furniture that will enhance the visiting experience for city visitors".
We started ideating about what type of street furniture we should design. We came up with the following ideas:
- A place to socially interact like a bench
- Place where people can go skating, without any restrictions.
- An area where people can take shelter if it suddenly starts raining and they don't have an umbrella.
- A better version of the currently available bins. We brainstormed many ideas like ballot bin, automatic recycling bins, bins that are marked on google maps so that blind person can easily find the bin.
- Some kind of illusion art where people can click photos with.
- A Digital booth is also a place where people can click photos, but here they can upload and customise the background. (Inspired by: Selfie Central)
- Pixel Grid Art: A community art board that gives users the opportunity to place a pixel every 2 minutes to be a part of a large image that is constantly changing based on community input. (Inspired by: Yayoi Kusama's Obliteration Room).
- Deep Bin: It gives the illusion of throwing something inside a deep hole by making a falling sound. At the end of the sound effect, a crashing sound is played to give the impression that the trash has reached the bottom. This works on the concept of fun theory, which encourages people to do more.
- Automatic Recycle Bin: Which sorts the garbage automatically.
- Ballot Bin
- Bin with a basketball hoop
Interviews will be kept short around 5 - 10 minutes with accompanying audio recording
Surveys using google forms.
Questionnaire:
https://forms.gle/qV8aKEcGGbcCKb7B7
There is a positive skew towards “accessible” suggesting that there isn't much of an issue with accessibility however, this can be improved.
A strong yes suggests that the current bin situation adequately fulfils the needs of the average user. However, it would be interesting to explore further why one participant said “no”. This could open up new avenues of research.
Looking at the data there are some varied responses but a common theme is “hygiene”
Qualitative Methods

Reflection on first 4 interviews
Recorded 2 out of 4 interview
For the 2 guys it was difficult to get everything down, rich information but some of it was off topic
Hard to keep on subject
Didnt feel like they understood the goals of the research
Didnt ask follow up questions - conscious of time
Only asked people who work at a university
Aksing more about the social ramifications of recycling
Taking notes disrupts flow and distracting
Feel like theyre not being listened to and we are only point scoring
Give suggestions to help inform people options within the context
Participants were taken from one area
Review
Difficult to know how well you have recycled
Different people have different mental models for bins eg office worker vs a school child
There’s not much of an accessibility problem in terms of people being disabled or being in different age groups. The main issues seem to be usability issues where people can't decide where to throw what or are not able to find bins (To be discussed)
Research method critic
Ideally an observer, but this will affect answers
Trash bins that are currently available fulfil their basic role which is garbage collection. But it can be hard to recycle for international students or tourists since they might don't know how recycling works in the country. Also, some of the bins get full quickly and can be unhygienic.
- Making it recycling-friendly by making the process automatic. (Self sot)
- Trying to make bins rewarding so that people can have some kind of positive emotion (Fun) that will encourage them to throw more.
- Bin which automatically seals, stores, and replaces rubbish bags when it gets full.

Comments
Post a Comment